Publications — Overviews
Report on Testing the PS705 in Russian Hospital
V. V. Iljina | 17.10.2006
February 13, 2006 — April 13, 2006.
There were treated 47 patients, age 17 to 83 yrs., having the following diseases: osteochondrosis, arthrosis of knee and hip joints, calcaneal spurs, fractures of upper and lower limbs, polytrauma — 2 patients, open fracture of shin — 5 patients, closed craniocerebral injury (concussion and contusion of the brain, extensive hematoma and multiple wounds on the head) — 2 patients, varicose veins and thrombophlebitis — 2 patients.
Areas of treatment: basic areas (3 pathways, 6 points), local areas (sacroiliac, lumbar, area of fracture, healthy limb, area of kidneys, liver, adrenals, etc.). Sessions every day or every other day, 20 to 60 minutes.
I usually started treatment in ‘active area search’ mode. The patients were very surprised when the devices “showed” the exact problem in the body, which has not been mentioned by the patient or which the patient was not aware of. They said: “What a ‘clever’ device!” When the most active area was found we continued in ‘treatment’ mode using comfortable action energy levels and minimal action energy levels when worked on the face or neck. When the activity of the area lowered during treatment, I placed the electrode on another area or changed the position of the electrode.
With acute conditions effect of treatment was observed after 5-15-30 minutes of action. Often the effect of treatment manifested several hours after treatment or next day (pain relieving effect). If the patient did not feel any change during treatment the device was moved over the whole area of treatment to look for “sticky” parts of the area which were treated then.
After session all patients noticed relaxing effect, easiness, they calmed down, their sleep normalized and improved. Pain subsided during treatment or right after session. Swelling subsided during treatment. After 2-3-5 sessions soft tissues normalized, no swelling, surface of phlyctenas epithelialized, wounds healed within approximately 7 days, hematomas resolved within 5–7 days.
In cases of cervical osteochondrosis numbness in arms disappeared after 2–4 sessions; “flickering in the eyes” was eliminated during the first session.
For patients with third-degree osteoarthrosis concurrent with sever pathological condition the effect of treatment was achieved slower and was accompanied by recurrent short worsening of condition.
Cases of severe worsening being a reaction to SCENAR-therapy were not observed at all. One patient who had osteochondrosis and prostatitis experienced pain in the region of kidney after the second session (several years ago he had pathological condition of the kidney). Pain lasted for several hours, then subsided. After the fifth session he complained of pain in the hip joint; pain stopped at the following session.
Two times, two female patients complained of acute pains in the region of stomach (both had peptic ulcer). After 1–2 sessions pains were eliminated.
One female patient experienced pain in the region of heel (calcaneal spur). After one session pain was eliminated.
Female patient — multitrauma. At the fifth session experienced pain in the region of kidney which lasted several minutes. The patient had stone in this kidney pelvis. Pain subsided during the session.
Female patient — osteochondrosis. Twice at the session experienced pains in the shoulder joint which had been damaged several years ago. Pains subsided at the same session and never disturbed the patient again.
Male patient — cervical vascular dystonia (hypotonic type). Headaches stopped after 5 minutes of action. Arterial pressure normalized after the session. The patient has had no headaches for 1.5 months now.
Female patient – bronchial asthma, bronchiectasis. After the first session, severe pains in the chest decreased. Pains in the stomach (caused by hormonal therapy) ceased after three sessions. After each session the patient felt increased energy. Temperature normalized after 5 sessions. After 15 sessions the patient felt good, was active and able to do the whole work about the house.
Patients with fractures of the limbs. Swelling subsided during the first session, pain decreased or subsided completely. Hematomas resolved after 3–5 sessions.
Patients with open fractures. Soft tissues normalized after 2–3 sessions. Wounds healed by primary intention.
Immunity increased in all patients — this was confirmed by immunograms or blood tests (lymphocyte and monocyte counts increased to normal).
Male patient with multitrauma — consolidation of the broken bones speeded up: fractures of the neck and head of the humerus grew together within 4 weeks (instead of usual 6–8 weeks), and fracture of the kneecap —
within 1.5–months (instead of 2–2.5 months). As a rule, in cases of multitrauma fractures consolidate slower (or one fracture consolidates but the other one doesn’t).
Three female patients noticed difference in sensations and effect of treatment between SCENAR device, model PS705 by “LET Medical” and SCENAR devices of OKB “Ritm” (which they have been treated with before with little or no effect). Before treatment with SCENAR PS705 they were rather skeptical and said that SCENAR-therapy was not effective. After the first session with PS705 they changed their mind. After the course of sessions they all noticed positive effect of treatment.
Female patient with consolidated fracture of ankle. During several months she experienced signs of thrombophlebitis – that was the reason why the metalware could not be removed from her body during 9 months. The patient was put to hospital for removal of metalware 9 months after the surgery. Her foot, ankle, and shin were badly swollen (post-thrombophlebitis syndrome). She had two sessions with PS705 before surgery. The swelling decreased nearly to normal size. After the surgery we treated postoperative wound and postoperative area. The patient did not take any pain-killers or antibiotics. Postoperative wound healed by primary intention. Stitches were removed on the 8th day after surgery. When the patient left hospital, no swelling was observed.
It takes long to complete the dose.
During preliminary analysis LEDs need some time to switch off while moving the device to another area.
We noticed some hissing sound after several days of work.
Battery replacement is not very convenient. It would be better if the device could be charged like a cell phone, with the help of charger, without removing batteries from the device. Some batteries are not suitable for the device (though they are the same size and well-known manufacturer).
Very convenient is that this device has LED indication instead of display. It allows the user to monitor the treatment process very quickly and easily.
The device is simple in use. Patients can learn how to operate the device very quickly.
Materials provided by orthopedist-traumatologist V. V. Iljina.
Municipal Treatment-and-Prophylactic Institution, Emergency Hospital No.2, Rostov-on-Don.
Translated by Elena Khatkova “LET Medical”